An Interview with Computing Pioneer Alan Kay
Article by http://www.Batteryer.Co.Uk : Born in the sphere of 1940, central processing unit scientist Alan Curtis Kay is lone of a handful of visionaries the largest part guilty in favor of the concepts which get propelled individual computing advance in excess of the elapsed thirty years — and surely the the largest part quotable lone.
He’s the gentleman who understood with the aim of “The preeminent way to predict the expectations is to invent it” and with the aim of “Technology is whatever thing with the aim of wasn’t around as you were born” and with the aim of “If you don’t fail by smallest amount 90 percent of the spell, you’re not aiming from top to bottom adequate.” And as I originally adage Microsoft‘s plane tablet remaining June, a Kay maxim helped me understand it: “People who are really serious approximately software ought to cause their own hardware.”
Higher than all, however, Kay is accepted in favor of the Dynabook — his decades-old mental picture of a portable suite of hardware, software, brainwashing tools and services which would add up to the ultimate creative ecosystem in favor of kids of all ages. Each new portable central processing unit reflects elements of the Dynabook view — the lone Laptop apiece baby project’s XO higher than all others — and yet nobody of them get fully realized the view which Kay was characters approximately in the sphere of the initial 1970s.
In point of fact, Kay says with the aim of more or less gadgets with superficial Dynabook-like qualities, such such as the iPad, get not solitary botched to realize the Dynabook pipe dream, but get in the sphere of more or less senses betrayed it. That’s lone of the points he makes in the sphere of this interview, conducted by central processing unit historian David Greelish, owner of the Classic Computing Blog and organizer of this month’s Vintage central processing unit Festival Southeast in the sphere of Atlanta. (The Festival preference item a pop-up Apple museum featuring Xerox’s pioneering Alto workstation, which Kay worked on, such as well such as policy which acutely reflected his influence, plus the Lisa, the real McCoy Macintosh and the Newton.)
Kay and Greelish besides discuss Kay’s experiences by more or less of the substantial outfits someplace he’s worked, plus Xerox’s fabulous PARC labs, Apple, Disney and HP. In the present day, Kay continues his seek approximately children and know-how by his own organization, the Viewpoints seek Institute.
–Harry McCracken
David Greelish: Complete you permit with the aim of we at this moment for the most part get the Dynabook, such as spoken in the sphere of the three tiers of new individual computing; the notebook, tablet and smartphone? If not, what did you say? Disapproving facial appearance complete you check missing from these? Get they delivered on the augur of humanizing education?
Alan Kay: I get been asked versions of this question in favor of the remaining twenty years or else so. Ninety-five percent of the Dynabook point was a “service conception,” and five percent had to complete with corporeal forms, of which solitary lone — the slim notebook — is in the main in the sphere of the known think about. (The other two were an extrapolated version of Ivan Sutherland’s regulate mounted put on view, and an extrapolated version of Nicholas Negroponte’s ideas approximately omnipresent computers embedded and networked ubiquitously.)
In the sphere of order to discussion approximately the service point, I in the main immediately stick with the lowest with the aim of had to take place delivered (even though a serious anticipation back in the sphere of the ’60s was with the aim of AI would progress adequate to allow “helpful agents” — such as in the sphere of [pioneering central processing unit scientist John] McCarthy’s “Advice Taker” — to take place a stake of the user-interface experience). We imaginary the overlapping window, icons, and all that., graphical-user interface by PARC and immediately concentrated on it as it became vindicate with the aim of the “helpful agent” wasn’t ready to county show up in the sphere of the decade of the ’70s (and still hasn’t).
The attention-grabbing device approximately this question is with the aim of it is quite vindicate from the several initial ID with the aim of it was an secondary feature in favor of the Dynabook to take place able to simulate all existing media in the sphere of an editable/authorable form in the sphere of a highly portable networked (including wireless) form. The highest feature was in favor of it to take place able to qualitatively reach the notions of “reading, characters, sharing, publishing, and all that. Of ideas” literacy to include the “computer recital, characters, sharing, publishing of ideas” with the aim of is the computer’s special province.
In favor of all media, the real McCoy intent was “symmetric authoring and consuming”.
Isn’t it sparkler vindicate with the aim of this remaining and the largest part principal service is quite not there in the sphere of today’s computing in favor of the broad-spectrum known? Apple with the iPad and iPhone goes even foster and does not allow children to download an Etoy made by an extra baby somewhere in the sphere of the humankind. This may well not take place farther from the real McCoy intentions of the complete ARPA-IPTO/PARC cooperation in the sphere of the ’60s and ’70s.
Apple’s reasons in favor of this are mostly bogus, and to the coverage with the aim of security is an copy, what did you say? Is insecure are the OSes supplied by the vendors (and the insecurities are the consequence of their own bad practices — they are not necessary).
Complete our new individual computing policy augment education? Get they lived up to what did you say? Was foreseen in the sphere of the elapsed? Are they really portion teachers teach in the sphere of the classroom?
The perspective on this is originally to ask whether the current edifying practices are even using books in the sphere of a powerful and educative way. Or else even to ask whether the classroom process with no several special media by all is educative.
I would say, to a distressing coverage, the answer is “no.”
The education firm in the sphere of the U.S. Has in the main treated the central processing unit (a) originally such as undesirable and shunned it, (b) such as sort of like a typewriter, (c) not such as a shoddy but a smaller amount legible textbook with less significant pages, and all that. (d) such as something in favor of AP trying, (e) has not ventured into what did you say? Is special approximately computing with reference to modeling ideas and portion to think approximately them.
This in the sphere of malevolence of pioneers such such as Seymour Papert explaining both in the sphere of broad-spectrum (and quite a crumb specifically) immediately what did you say? It is and how it can transfigure education.
I’ve used the analogy of what did you say? Would transpire if you position a piano in the sphere of each classroom. If near is rebuff other context, you preference grow a “chopsticks” culture, and maybe even a pop culture. And this is pretty much what did you say? Is event.
In the sphere of other lexis, “the melody is not in the sphere of the piano”.
Tags : Alan Kay,central processing unit,Pioneer,apple,ipad
From: Digital and Technology
Asus Eee PC 901バッテリー http://www.gooddenchi.jp/Asus/Asus-Eee-PC-901-battery.html
Asus A32-UL20 http://www.gooddenchi.jp/Asus/Asus-A32-UL20-battery.html
Asus K73バッテリー http://www.gooddenchi.jp/Asus/Asus-K73-battery.html